Read 'Time management tips' feature

Three UK banks in £37bn Government bailout

11:11am GMT, Monday, 13 October 2008

Chancellor Alistair Darling has described the move to stabilise banks as beneficial to taxpayers. Chancellor Alistair Darling has described the move to stabilise banks as beneficial to taxpayers.

The Government will today inject £37 billion into three of the UK’s biggest banks in an attempt to prevent a UK banking meltdown.

The cash will bail out The Royal Bank of Scotland, Lloyds TSB and HBOS, making the Government the biggest shareholder in at least two of the banks.

The unprecedented move follows a weekend of negotiations, which were today confirmed by the Treasury.

Under the deal, the banks’ board members will not receive cash bonuses for 2008 and further down the line. The Government will also have the power to appoint directors to their boards of directors.

Over the next three years, the banks are now committed to “maintaining the availability of competitively-priced lending to homeowners and small businesses at 2007 levels”, the Treasury said. They are also required to support schemes to help those struggling with mortgage repayments stay in their homes.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4 this morning, Chancellor Alistair Darling said the move to stabilise banks will benefit taxpayers in the long-term.

He told the BBC: “There is every reason to be confident that, as we go through this, the British taxpayer will get his money back.”

Speaking at a Downing Street news conference, Prime Minister Gordon Brown described the bailout as an “unprecedented but essential” move that was “something that matters for every family and business in Britain.”

“We must, in an uncertain and unstable world, be the rock of stability on which the British people can depend… To let the chips fall where they may would be the height of irresponsibility,” he said.

More information is at: http://hm-treasury.gov.uk

By Natasha Piscitelli

Comments:

 
Dave So Says:

Fred Goodwin ex senior director of The Royal Bank of Scotland should lose his pension. He hasn’t done well for his company and should suffer the consequences. Should the senior director for any company not be held responsible? Letting him get away with such a big pension is ludicrous.

Pingbacks/Trackbacks:

Categories:
Business, Finance



Subscribe to ICM News

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

eNewsletter signup

Sign up to our free eNewsletter, and receive the headlines direct to your inbox.

Opinion poll

Should broadband be a legal right for every citizen?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
    • No results available
    • No results available
Latest news
National Briefing | WEST: California: Rocket Launches With Secret Payload
The largest rocket ever launched from the West Coast blasted off Thursday with a classified defense ...
Read More
German Ifo survey hits 20-year high
Business sentiment of 7,000 companies confounds forecasts of a flat reading to hit highest level sin ...
Read More
NASA’s Stardust Probe Readies for Date with Comet Tempel 1 (Time.com)
Time.com - Stardust’s Valentine’s Day meeting with comet Tempel 1 will be not only a sci ...
Read More
© 2012 The Institute of Commercial Management (ICM), ICM House, Castleman Way, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 3BA, UK